"All
nature is but art, unknown to thee;
All chance, direction which thou canst not see;
All discord, harmony not understood;
All partial evil, universal good;
And, spite of pride, in erring reason's spite,
One truth is clear, Whatever is, is right."(1)
It is impossible
to extrapolate culture from society as they exist in symbiosis and are essential
to one another in their evolution rather like Steinberg's hands that draw
each other (app.1).
As art constitutes a large part of any society's cultural wealth, the same
must necessarily be said of it. Aspects of art are varied and manifold. Wherever
one looks one encounters art in one form or another, whether it's on television,
in films, photographs, architecture, landscaping, sculpture, literature or
in the broadsheet newspapers. One of the earliest functions of art was as
a means of relating historical events, for example the Bayeux Tapestry (app.2)
and Trajan's column in Rome (app.3).
The list of things that can be spoken of in relation to art is endless and
all contribute to our society and cultural identity. Whether it be a positive
contribution or a negative one it serves to help shape our lives and our minds
in one way or another. It therefore follows that it is also a way that we
as individuals may make a contribution to society, even if it is only through
our observations and insights.
"As
a result of the infinite permutations or reciprocity of the individual.
As a result of the infinite permutations of heredity, the individual will
inevitably be unique, and this uniqueness, because it is something not possessed
by any one else, will be of value to the community. It may be only a unique
way of speaking or of smiling - but that contributes to life's variety.
But it may be a unique way of seeing, of thinking, of inventing, of expressing
mind or emotion - and in that case, one man's individuality may be of incalculable
benefit to the whole of humanity."(2)
What distinguishes
art from other forms of cultural activity is that it speaks to people directly.
It is, if you like, a coded message from one subconscious to another. The
possession of the Ôkeys' to these coded messages are not exclusive to those
that have had the benefit of a fine art education. Often the artists themselves
are not fully aware of all the implications of their work until years have
elapsed. They are merely explorers in the same way that those who are able
to view the work are explorers on an exciting visual, aural, and tactile adventure.
One of the problems
to be addressed with respect to the arts (particularly in the United Kingdom)
is the individual's attitude towards it. For a long time it has been seen
as exclusively the terrain of highbrow intellectual's and not an area for
the ordinary person. To a certain extent this attitude still persists. A most
common assumption seems to be that unless a work of art is clearly representational
of something recognisable then it will not be liked or understood by the average
person in the street. These fallacies were originally seeded by the latter-day
bourgeoisie and are perpetuated by cultural and educational elitists. Artists
such as Carl Andre have rebelled against this perception of art and answered
this misconception in a way that should make it clear that art is not just
about high brow painterly and sculptorly objects, it can also be about a pile
of ordinary everyday firebricks. Although it ma y still take some time
for this message to be decoded and assimilated by the masses.
Channel 4's experiment
with the community on the Byker Grove estate proved to be successful in changing
some of these attitudes towards, in particular, modern art. They selected
members of that community, who had no previous formal involvement with the
arts, to become the procurers and curators for an exhibition that was to be
held on the estate. This experiment provided evidence that a wide spectrum
of art forms can be fully appreciated and analysed by people, no matter what
their denomination and that everyone's experience is enriched and improved
by involvement and exposure to it.
In his book 'Art
in Society', Ken Baynes outlines how and why the misconceptions about art
came into being:
"In
our technological society, built over centuries on the upward thrust of
a merchant class seeking to establish blood lines that it didn't have, the
newly rich took many cues from the aristocratic and clerical classes they
were replacing. Merchants and the sons of merchants sought in the possession
of artistic objects a connection with the societal wellsprings of so much
art of the past. But given the ability of a technological society to reproduce
things, this acquisitive class, having acquired means, naturally downgraded
utilitarian artefacts; the fact of profusion made them less valuable. How
could one establish privilege if everyone could possess the same things?
Not unnaturally, this attitude was a carry-over from bourgeois attitudes
emerging from the business world itself - scarcity produces value."(3)
Thankfully it
takes more than a few petty minded individuals with a superiority complex
to seriously inhibit what is an organic part of societal evolution. This is
most fortunate from the historian's point of view. Community art is an essential
ingredient in the historical documentation of the various different stages
in the development of mankind. A good example of this kind of ongoing documentation
is graffiti wall art and murals. In this instance artists may work in collaboration
with local residents in order to create murals locally that reflect on events
that concern that community. This kind of projects occurs most frequently
in inner-city areas. It first started to develop in the late Ô60's, early
70's and in some places, such as what was until quite recently the ÔTabernacle'
community centre in West London, it has become an intrinsic part of everyday
community life. Graffiti and mural are also employed as a means for protest
when the misrepresented and usually silent majority utilise the medium to
voice their general discontent with situations that they have had to put up
with for too long (see
app.4). A work of this nature was observed in the mid 70's in the
United States by Alan Barnett:
"In
an inner-city park in 1974, a Latino teenage gang was doing an unauthorised
painting on the side of a field house that displayed a blue uniformed figure
offering drugs and a gun to the young. The painters were holding off placing
a star on his chest until everything else was finished for fear that the
Police would have it painted out before the neighborhood could get a good
look at it. Everyone who had grown up in that Barrio knew that it represented
what happens there, said Ray Patlan, then art director of a nearby community
centre whom the gang had consulted. But the public media were not available
for this kind of indictment and such charges would never make the courts
in a city controlled by Mayor Daley's political machine. The mural was a
public statement and a means of building opposition in the community. It
was guerrilla art. While almost all of the murals that have been done in
the current movement do have the permission of the owner of the wall, they
frequently challenge the social and political establishment."(4)
The community
artist can function as a catalyst for the coming together of people - across
generations - to create a work of art that is socially and politically aware
and available to the public at all times. This can only help to strengthen
the fabric of any community and promote a sense of security, born from the
realisation that local people care and notice about what goes on in that area.
It would be a sound investment to provide funds and resources in order to
encourage the growth of community arts projects. A well integrated society
can police itself, it is this integration that the arts can be a catalyst
for and this would surely be a saving for society in the long run.
"The
theory put forward embraces all modes of self-expression, literary and poetic
(verbal) no less than musical or aural, and forms an integral approach to
reality which should be called aesthetic education - the education of those
senses upon which consciousness, and ultimately the intelligence and judgment
of the human individual are based. It is only in so far as these senses
are brought into harmonious and habitual relationship with the external
world that an integrated personality is built up. Without such integration
we get, not only the psychologically unbalanced types familiar to the psychiatrist,
but what is even more disastrous from the point of view of the general good,
those arbitrary systems of thought, dogmatic or rationalistic in origin,
which seek in despite of the natural facts to impose a logical or intellectual
pattern on the world of organic life."(5)
An effect of
the elitist attitude to art that has existed in our society for some time
now, is the lack of integration of an alarmingly high proportion of individuals
into society. The over population that exists in the prisons of the western
world is a testimony to this. Art can provide a means of transforming destructive
energy and emotions such as anger and violence into creative energy. The arts
provide us with a conduit to the subconscious, enabling us to work through
aggression, frustration and bad experiences, that may not otherwise be addressed.
Un-defused they are potential mind bombs that may explode at any time.
"Developmentally,
the use of art as a creative medium can encourage very gently one's own
self confidence and self esteem, together with physical and intellectual
areas of ability."(6)
Art has proven
to be particularly effective as a therapy not only for those with emotional
and learning disabilities but also as part of the rehabilitation programme
for offenders. In a research project that was funded by the Arts Council and
the Home Office, Anne Peaker and Jill Vincent of Loughborough University produced
a directory of prison activities in visual arts and crafts.
"This
was followed by ÔArts in Prisons: towards a sense of achievement (1990),
which gives an account of their research and findings and makes recommendations
for making arts activities available in a more coherent way. Peaker and
Vincent outline the personal and therapeutic benefits of arts activities:
fostering creativity, encouraging choices and decisions, increasing self-respect
and self esteem, developing self-awareness and understanding, channeling
emotions in a constructive way, expressing feelings, concentrating and making
an effort."(7)
Positive and
significant changes have been observed in offenders who have been exposed
to art and music therapy workshops. This may be an indicator for how their
imprisonment could possibly have been avoided in the first place. One of the
things that a lot of prisoners probably lacked beforehand is the guidance
and encouragement to Ômake their mark' in a creative way. The impetus is with
most of us to Ômake a mark' of some sort on society, unfortunately for some
people, the only way they know of doing this is in a destructive way.
"The
development of positive qualities inevitably eliminates their opposites.
We avoid hate by loving: we avoid sadism and masochism by community feeling
and action."(8)
If only the establishment
would take the arts more seriously and implement the development of creativity
as core curriculum subjects at infant, primary and secondary school levels,
I am sure that a lot of this misery could be avoided. Look after the pennies
and the pounds take care of themselves!
"Avoid
compulsion, and let your children's lessons take the form of play. This
will also help you to see what they are naturally fitted for."(9)
The school curriculum
of the present and the recent past does not seem to heed this ancient doctrine
and exploit the many benefits that a good creative grounding can offer the
individual and therefore society as a whole. Maths and English are of course
important subjects but first there must be properly established in children,
a sense of co-ordination, differentiation, identity and a pattern of achievement
. If these things are not encouraged and the child does not perform well with
core curriculum subjects, as all too frequently does happen, that child may
well start to assert his/her identity in the form of disruptive and rebellious
behaviors.
"Growth
... is, in effect, a very complicated adjustment of the subjective feelings
and emotions to the objective world, and the quality of thought and understanding,
and all the variations of personality and character, depend to a large extent
on the success or precision of this adjustment. The most important function
of education is concerned with this psychological Ôorientation', and for
this reason the education of the aesthetic sensibility is of fundamental
importance. It is a form of education of which only rudimentary traces are
found in the educational systems of the past, and which appears only in
a most haphazard and arbitrary fashion in the educational practice of the
present day."(10)
If the education
of children were approached more holistically with art as a core subject,
there is evidence that the majority of children's school work would benefit.
In a recent lecture at Bath Spa University on the subject of Art in Education,
Rosemary Devonald clearly outlined the process by which children can be encouraged
in their creative development. She stated that in schools where the children
were encouraged in this way, there was a marked benefit to their other curriculum
subjects, they displayed results that placed them far ahead of other schools.
Art in children's education should be a bottom line priority as it helps to
develop the analytical and differentiation skills in a child that are extremely
useful across all curriculum subjects. The ability to analyse children's art
enables the teacher to accurately assess what stage of development the child
is at :- "Stage does not necessarily relate to age".(11)
Another pertinent
point that Rosemary made, is that the experience that children gain through
this kind of education programme stays with them for the rest of their lives.
It cannot be
expected that the arts would provide a panacea for all society's ills, although
I am sure that they would be twice as effective a prevention as they have
been proved to be a cure. There are so many ways that the arts can be of benefit
to society and to all its individuals that it has only been possible to outline
a few here. It seems anomalous to me that many of these areas do not command
the respect and receive the funding that they deserve. By skimping financially
in these areas the government and local councils are making a false economy.
The effects of
this erroneous judgment on the behalf of the authorities can be seen in society
today when viewing the crime and unemployment figures. Respect breeds respect
and the arts in their turn will cock a snook at a system that has undervalued
its potential for such a long time, creativity and destructivity are two sides
of the same coin. The collaboration of artists with the community is of mutual
benefit to both artist and society. Unfortunately even the most altruistic
of artists can become rapidly disillusioned with the constant wrangling over
finances. This is a terrible shame considering the incredible progress that
can be made with those people who participate in workshops of various kinds.
There can be no doubt that appropriate funding for education in general would
contribute a great deal towards creating a better society for future generations.
REFERENCES
1. Alexander
Pope, Moral Essays Epistle.
2. Para. 2. Page
5. Educating Through Art.
3. Para 3. Page
5. Art in Society.
4. Para 4. Page
11. Community Murals.
5. Para 2. Page
7. Educating Through Art.
6. Para 4. Page
117. Art Therapy in Practice.
7. Para 2. Page
7. Art Therapy with Offenders.
8. Para 2. Page
6. Educating Through Art.
9. Plato's Theory
of Education.
10. Para 2. Page
7. Educating Through Art.
11. Rosemary
Devonald. ÔChildren's Art'. Lecture. Bath Spa University, 11/11/96.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Hidden Order
of Art by Anton Ehrenzweig. Published by Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
Community Murals,The
Peoples Art by Alan W. Barnett. Published by Cornwall Books.
Art in Society
by Ken Baynes. Published by Lund Humphries Publishers Ltd.
Art Therapy with
Offenders. Edited by Marian Liebmann. Foreword by Judge Stephen Tumin. Published
by Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Analyzing Children's
Art by Rhoda Kellogg. Published by Mayfield Publishing Company.
Educating Through
Art by Herbert Read. Published by Faber and Faber Ltd.
Art Therapy in
Practice. Edited by Marian Liebmann. Published by Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Working With
Children In Art Therapy. Edited by Caroline Case and Tessa Dalley. Published
by Tavistock/Routledge.
Art in Modern
Culture. Edited by Francis Frascina and Jonathon Harris. Published by Phaidon.
Art and Illusion
by E.H. Gombrich. Published by Phaidon.